There
are still, surprisingly
enough, some 250 agricultural
producers spread over the
Laval territory, which,
in fact, is the second largest
city in Québec. And
for the most part, they’re
either market farmers or
horticultural farmers, with
a few exceptions who operate
animal production farms,
such as Alain and Lyne Forget.
They operate a dairy farm
in Saint-François
de Laval with 80-head of
cattle, 45 of which are
lactating. Surrounded by
about 30,000 neighbours,
pressured by government
regulations and disposed
to better protect the environment,
they decided to install
a compost bin for their
livestock’s slurry.
A significant financial
endeavour – $200,000
– to completely process
farmyard manure and produce
quality compost that is
highly prized by professional
gardeners for its organic
content (51%) and its fertilizing
value (4-4-7).
The neighbouring community
should be thrilled with
this initiative? Not! The
compost bin, ideal from
an environmental perspective,
emits an aroma. In fact,
to ensure proper operations,
large amounts of cow dung
mixed with saw dust must
be manipulated twice per
month, and occasionally
stirs up a stronger stench
that is usually acceptable
in an agricultural setting,
but unpleasant for the delicate
senses of certain city dwellers.
What was to happen, did
in fact happen. From the
first day the compost bin
was in operation four years
ago, the family has been
through a veritable nightmare.
They’ve been beset
by rumours. Gossip-mongers
allege that the family,
with its diabolical machine,
will import slurry from
all over the area, that
ground water will be contaminated,
that pregnant women will
increase their risk of miscarriages!
And aside from these far-fetched
tales there are of course
the ever-present and increasing
anonymous complaints to
the Environment and Health
ministries.
Hypocrisy at its best.
Behind these lofty motives,
there are other less noble
ones that remain unspecified,
such as neighbours who own
white zoned land around
the farm and would prefer
a complete stop of the operations
on the part of the family.
Should the family forfeit
their lifestyle, just imagine
the value of these lots
located near a bucolic green
zone, and only 15 minutes
from Montreal!
In this world of anonymous
non-involvement and low
blows, psychological harassment
is a formidable and terrifying
weapon. The result: The
wife and mother whose only
wish is to be left alone
is having a hard time dealing
with the situation, the
proud husband and father
lives with his anger day
in and day out, as for the
kids, they’re concerned
and have discovered the
darker side of this noble
profession.
Let’s not forget about
collateral damage. Not only
are the two other brothers
working a nearby dairy farm
affected, but the family
patriarch, Yvon Forget,
a respectable gentleman
of 77, a village elder,
an ex-president of the Caisse
populaire, and actively
involved in farmers’
unionism, must also live
with this conflict. Sunday
church services aren’t
as enlightening since certain
neighbours have been giving
him nasty looks.
“You know, he said,
happiness on a farm is not
found in its buildings,
nor is it from the height
of its silos, it is in the
beauty of things and in
the satisfaction of having
successfully transferred
a family-owned business
to a fifth generation. It
can also be found in community
life where we feel loved
and respected by our neighbours.
Just three weeks ago, in
the course of the ‘open
house’ organized by
UPA at our farm, we had
over 2,000 visitors. A great
idea. A great success. It
feels good to feel appreciated,
to know that our job and
our work is useful. But
it’s not something
we’ll be hearing very
often.”
This is a very sensitive
and troubling issue: The
deeply-rooted fear that
is common to all farming
families, the fear of being
rejected by their community,
of becoming a laughing stock.
Allow me to ask these poor
delicate souls in Laval,
those faint-hearted, disgruntled
cowards who set up house
barely 30 meters from a
farm and complain about
the smells: In the end,
who should be liable for
aseptisizing agriculture?
The citizens who choose
to move closer to a farm
and benefit from the great
open spaces? Or the farmers
who are trying to make a
decent living?